<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arizona Daily Star Layoffs, the Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://borderreporter.com/2007/12/the-border-report-%e2%80%93-update-arizona-daily-star-layoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://borderreporter.com/2007/12/the-border-report-%e2%80%93-update-arizona-daily-star-layoffs/</link>
	<description>News and tales from the U.S.-Mexico border, covering immigration, politics, organized crime, Homeland Security, corruption and drug trafficking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader</title>
		<link>http://borderreporter.com/2007/12/the-border-report-%e2%80%93-update-arizona-daily-star-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-9090</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderreporter.com/?p=341#comment-9090</guid>
		<description>Looking at the list, it isn&#039;t exactly a decimation -- only one reporter, and that one from the very fluffy Neighbors section.  The report this morning said that there are still 165 newsroom employees, so this is about a 6% cut.  It won&#039;t make the Star any better -- that would take a stronger news philosophy -- but shouldn&#039;t make it any worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the list, it isn&#8217;t exactly a decimation &#8212; only one reporter, and that one from the very fluffy Neighbors section.  The report this morning said that there are still 165 newsroom employees, so this is about a 6% cut.  It won&#8217;t make the Star any better &#8212; that would take a stronger news philosophy &#8212; but shouldn&#8217;t make it any worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gail</title>
		<link>http://borderreporter.com/2007/12/the-border-report-%e2%80%93-update-arizona-daily-star-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-9089</link>
		<dc:creator>gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderreporter.com/?p=341#comment-9089</guid>
		<description>As a non newspaper person, all I can say is that the Star, which at one time was a very good local paper has been declining for at least 15 years. It&#039;s as if they repeatedly choose the path to loose themselves the most readers. The last innovative thing they did was Starnet, and they cancelled that in a manner most likely to alienate the users.

When I get those silly &#039;we-can-start-your-paper-tomorrow&#039; sales calls what they try to push is the weekly coupons or the Shopper. As if I care.

There is almost NO news left in the Star. I get their daily e-mail and try to check out articles regularly but rarely do I find an article worth while. Certainly I am not able to get &#039;news&#039; about Tucson from the Star.

Instead of figuring out how to provide more news, more information each step they took provided less news, less information. It&#039;s as if they think that somehow they are going to make up for that lack with format, or video, or a convoluted main web page, or I can&#039;t think what. 

I remember when all the news magazines went through a period (albeit over a period of years) of redesign. They all came out of that period looking (and almost &#039;sounding&#039; alike). It&#039;s like some consultants convinced them that the key to success was format alone. Content (news, research, reporting, intelligence, thoughtfulness, honesty) went along for the ride as a neglected step child.

I&#039;m probably overly negative because I resent loosing a good local newspaper. The Star still managed to put out some outstanding special reports even within the last few years. Haven&#039;t seen one recently, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a non newspaper person, all I can say is that the Star, which at one time was a very good local paper has been declining for at least 15 years. It&#8217;s as if they repeatedly choose the path to loose themselves the most readers. The last innovative thing they did was Starnet, and they cancelled that in a manner most likely to alienate the users.</p>
<p>When I get those silly &#8216;we-can-start-your-paper-tomorrow&#8217; sales calls what they try to push is the weekly coupons or the Shopper. As if I care.</p>
<p>There is almost NO news left in the Star. I get their daily e-mail and try to check out articles regularly but rarely do I find an article worth while. Certainly I am not able to get &#8216;news&#8217; about Tucson from the Star.</p>
<p>Instead of figuring out how to provide more news, more information each step they took provided less news, less information. It&#8217;s as if they think that somehow they are going to make up for that lack with format, or video, or a convoluted main web page, or I can&#8217;t think what. </p>
<p>I remember when all the news magazines went through a period (albeit over a period of years) of redesign. They all came out of that period looking (and almost &#8216;sounding&#8217; alike). It&#8217;s like some consultants convinced them that the key to success was format alone. Content (news, research, reporting, intelligence, thoughtfulness, honesty) went along for the ride as a neglected step child.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably overly negative because I resent loosing a good local newspaper. The Star still managed to put out some outstanding special reports even within the last few years. Haven&#8217;t seen one recently, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two days in Austin, Texas at Charles Apple</title>
		<link>http://borderreporter.com/2007/12/the-border-report-%e2%80%93-update-arizona-daily-star-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-9088</link>
		<dc:creator>Two days in Austin, Texas at Charles Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderreporter.com/?p=341#comment-9088</guid>
		<description>[...] hope you&#8217;re all well. Extra-special best wishes to our friends at The Arizona Star, The Arlington Heights Daily Herald and The Wall Street Journal, where painful changes are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hope you&#8217;re all well. Extra-special best wishes to our friends at The Arizona Star, The Arlington Heights Daily Herald and The Wall Street Journal, where painful changes are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADS RIP</title>
		<link>http://borderreporter.com/2007/12/the-border-report-%e2%80%93-update-arizona-daily-star-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-9086</link>
		<dc:creator>ADS RIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 03:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderreporter.com/?p=341#comment-9086</guid>
		<description>Yay for John Humenik. I wonder if he announced his &#039;promotion&#039; as he handed out the 11 pink slips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay for John Humenik. I wonder if he announced his &#8216;promotion&#8217; as he handed out the 11 pink slips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BorderReporter.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ARIZONA DAILY STAR LAYOFFS</title>
		<link>http://borderreporter.com/2007/12/the-border-report-%e2%80%93-update-arizona-daily-star-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-9084</link>
		<dc:creator>BorderReporter.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ARIZONA DAILY STAR LAYOFFS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderreporter.com/?p=341#comment-9084</guid>
		<description>[...] here for my update to this story. The Tucson Weekly is now reporting, and sources have confirmed, that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here for my update to this story. The Tucson Weekly is now reporting, and sources have confirmed, that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

